I read a little bit of a book a long time ago, and to my own detriment abandoned it for reasons no longer clear to me. It was called ‘Living With Honor’, and it was intended as an exploration of pagan ethics. It posited that, of all the diversity to be found among western Neo-Pagan religions, there are four common threads: Fashion (Paganism as a marketing gimmick or lifestyle), Magic (all such faiths leave room for the possibility of supernatural occurrences), knowledge (all such traditions value ancient learning and revere understanding), and a reverence for or a delight in nature.
Now, supposing one were to agree with this (and having read the book I’d say that in an ideal world, the author is spot-on), one must then go on to ask what these values mean for those who consider themselves Neo-Pagan. What are our ethical responsibilities within this framework of values?
In my opinion, we first and foremost must commit ourselves to an open attitude regarding all new knowledge and discoveries, approaching without bias or prejudice all new knowledge as brought to light in the fields of physics and metaphysics. We must not—cannot—cling to the ignorance of the past, and while I do not endorse blind acceptance of new technologies, we must at least marvel at our own creative capacity. To reject scientific advancement as ‘unnatural’ is in direct opposition to everything a true Neo-Pagan should stand for. Man is of nature; all our faculties are naturally produced. While man may attempt to go against the natural order of things, is that attitude not itself man’s very Nature?
To sum up: any Neo-Pagan who calls for a complete rejection of modernity and a return to ‘simpler times’ is guilty at best of excess sentimentality, and at worst of willful ignorance. Science brought us solar power—would you have us reject that? Science brought us eyeglasses—would you rather go blind?
